Reading & Writing Quarterly

14.8k citations
839 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Reading and Literacy Development
    • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
    • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Education top 5%
    • Writing and Handwriting Education
    • Child Development and Digital Technology
    • Parental Involvement in Education

Papers in

    • Reading and Literacy Development 476
    • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods 91
    • Writing and Handwriting Education 191
    • Child Development and Digital Technology 93
    • Parental Involvement in Education 79
    • Education and Technology Integration 63

Reading & Writing Quarterly

749 papers receiving 12.5k citations

Peers

Reading & Writing Quarterly
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 8.7k
  • Education 9.5k
  • Statistics and Probability 1.5k
  • Language and Linguistics 1.8k
  • Literature and Literary Theory 1.7k
Replace Reading Psychology with:
Reading Psychology United States
Educational Measurement Issues and Practice United States
Educational Research and Evaluation United States
Journal of Research in Reading United Kingdom
Topics in Language Disorders United States
Journal of Research in Childhood Education United States
Journal of Education United States
Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice United Kingdom
New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development United States
Applied Measurement in Education United States
Reading & Writing Quarterly relative to Reading Psychology United States Reading Psychology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Reading Psychology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Reading & Writing Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reading & Writing Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reading & Writing Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reading & Writing Quarterly more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Reading & Writing Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reading & Writing Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reading & Writing Quarterly.

About Reading & Writing Quarterly

The 839 papers published in Reading & Writing Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 14.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Reading & Writing Quarterly usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (597 papers), Education (562 papers), Statistics and Probability (127 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (101 papers) and Language and Linguistics (87 papers) specifically the topics of Reading and Literacy Development (476 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (191 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (127 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (93 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (91 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (82 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (79 papers) and Education and Technology Integration (63 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reading & Writing Quarterly are Frank Pajares, Dale H. Schunk, Paul R. Pintrich, Elizabeth A. Linnenbrink, Mary J. Schleppegrell, Barry J. Zimmerman, Gordon D. Logan, John T. Guthrie, Marcia H. Davis and Linda Baker.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact