Cambridge Journal of Education

1.3k papers and 26.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Cambridge Journal of Education in the last decades have received a total of 26.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Cambridge Journal of Education usually cover Education (878 papers), Sociology and Political Science (342 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (163 papers) specifically the topics of Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (265 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (132 papers) and Global Educational Policies and Reforms (123 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cambridge Journal of Education are Philip Hallinger, Lynn Thomas, Catherine Beauchamp, Jennifer Nias, Flávio Comim, Jack Whitehead, Robin Alexander, Helen Arnold, Donald McIntyre and David C. Berliner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cambridge Journal of Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cambridge Journal of Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cambridge Journal of Education.

Countries where authors publish in Cambridge Journal of Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cambridge Journal of Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cambridge Journal of Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cambridge Journal of Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025