Cultural Studies of Science Education

1.1k papers and 10.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Cultural Studies of Science Education in the last decades have received a total of 10.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Cultural Studies of Science Education usually cover Education (731 papers), Sociology and Political Science (299 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (284 papers) specifically the topics of Science Education and Pedagogy (283 papers), Indigenous and Place-Based Education (131 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (130 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cultural Studies of Science Education are Wolff‐Michael Roth, Karen L. Tonso, Kenneth Tobin, Dana L. Zeidler, Lucy Avraamidou, Anna Stetsenko, Glen S. Aikenhead, Jesse Bazzul, Masakata Ogawa and Angela Calabrese Barton.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cultural Studies of Science Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cultural Studies of Science Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cultural Studies of Science Education.

Countries where authors publish in Cultural Studies of Science Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cultural Studies of Science Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cultural Studies of Science Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cultural Studies of Science Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025