Curriculum Inquiry

1.5k papers and 25.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Curriculum Inquiry in the last decades have received a total of 25.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Curriculum Inquiry usually cover Education (833 papers), Sociology and Political Science (555 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (154 papers) specifically the topics of Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (299 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (248 papers) and Global Education and Multiculturalism (164 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Curriculum Inquiry are Max van Manen, Jean Anyon, Freema Elbaz, D. Jean Clandinin, Mary Field Belenky, Jill Mattuck Tarule, Blythe McVicker Clinchy, Nancy Goldberger, Mark Johnson and Henry A. Giroux.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Curriculum Inquiry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Curriculum Inquiry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Curriculum Inquiry.

Countries where authors publish in Curriculum Inquiry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Curriculum Inquiry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Curriculum Inquiry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Curriculum Inquiry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025