Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education
606 papers
receiving
6.1k citations
Peers
Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
Education5.0k
Developmental and Educational Psychology1.9k
Theoretical Computer Science145
Statistics and Probability792
Computer Science Applications340
Replace Journal of Education with:
Journal of EducationUnited States
International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and TechnologyUnited States
Mathematics Education Research JournalAustralia
Research in Mathematics EducationUnited Kingdom
Computers in the SchoolsUnited States
Journal of Mathematics Teacher EducationUnited States
Journal of Research in Childhood EducationUnited States
Mathematical Thinking and LearningUnited States
American Journal of EducationUnited States
AcademeUnited States
Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Educationrelative toJournal of EducationUnited StatesJournal of Education's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.6×
Journal of Education · 1×
×0.55k/10kEDUCA
×0.72k/3kDEP
×6.6145/22TCS
×1.7792/476SP
×0.8340/402CSA
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education
This network shows the impact of papers published in Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education.
About Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education
The 727 papers published in Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education in the last decades have received a total of 7.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education usually cover Theoretical Computer Science (28 papers), Education (536 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (190 papers), Statistics and Probability (119 papers) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (22 papers) specifically the topics of Science Education and Pedagogy (204 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (202 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (88 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (81 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (80 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (67 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (55 papers) and Statistics Education and Methodologies (55 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education are Derek Hodson, Glen S. Aikenhead, Peter J. Fensham, Larry Bencze, Jennifer M. Langer-Osuna, Wolff‐Michael Roth, Michael Reiß, Brian Lewthwaite, Isha DeCoito and Fouad Abd‐El‐Khalick.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.