Mathematical Thinking and Learning

14.5k citations
460 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
    • Statistics Education and Methodologies
  • Education top 2%
    • Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
    • Science Education and Pedagogy
    • Education and Technology Integration
    • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies

Papers in

Mathematical Thinking and Learning

412 papers receiving 12.5k citations

Peers

Mathematical Thinking and Learning
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Statistics and Probability 6.5k
  • Education 11.6k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 3.8k
  • Theoretical Computer Science 270
  • Computer Science Applications 909
Replace Mathematics Education Research Journal with:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Australia
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education United States
Research in Mathematics Education United Kingdom
Cognition and Instruction United States
Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education Canada
Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik Germany
Journal of the Learning Sciences United States
Review of Research in Education United States
Mind Brain and Education United States
Teaching Mathematics and its Applications An International Journal of the IMA United Kingdom
Mathematical Thinking and Learning relative to Mathematics Education Research Journal Australia Mathematics Education Research Journal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Mathematics Education Research Journal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Mathematical Thinking and Learning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Mathematical Thinking and Learning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Mathematical Thinking and Learning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathematical Thinking and Learning more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Mathematical Thinking and Learning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Mathematical Thinking and Learning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Mathematical Thinking and Learning.

About Mathematical Thinking and Learning

The 460 papers published in Mathematical Thinking and Learning in the last decades have received a total of 14.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Mathematical Thinking and Learning usually cover Statistics and Probability (274 papers), Theoretical Computer Science (15 papers), Education (388 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (125 papers) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (12 papers) specifically the topics of Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (339 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (209 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (101 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (87 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (69 papers), Education and Technology Integration (44 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (31 papers) and Education Methods and Practices (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Mathematical Thinking and Learning are Judit Moschkovich, Luis Radford, Koeno Gravemeijer, Paul Cobb, Na’ilah Suad Nasir, Martin A. Simon, Richard Lehrer, Julie Sarama, Douglas H. Clements and Jinfa Cai.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact