Mathematical Thinking and Learning

About

The 444 papers published in Mathematical Thinking and Learning in the last decades have received a total of 13.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Mathematical Thinking and Learning usually cover Education (381 papers), Statistics and Probability (269 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (122 papers) specifically the topics of Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (333 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (205 papers) and Statistics Education and Methodologies (98 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Mathematical Thinking and Learning are Judit Moschkovich, Koeno Gravemeijer, Luis Radford, Paul Cobb, Martin A. Simon, Na’ilah Suad Nasir, Kpe Koeno Gravemeijer, Jinfa Cai, Richard Lehrer and Douglas H. Clements.

In The Last Decade

Mathematical Thinking and Learning

403 papers receiving 11.5k citations

Fields of papers published in Mathematical Thinking and Learning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Mathematical Thinking and Learning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Mathematical Thinking and Learning.

Countries where authors publish in Mathematical Thinking and Learning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Mathematical Thinking and Learning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Mathematical Thinking and Learning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathematical Thinking and Learning more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026