Griffith University

58.4k papers receiving 1.8M citations

Peers

Griffith University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Marketing 60.2k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 58.5k
  • Ecology 142.6k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 64.2k
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 8.0k
Replace The University of Queensland with:
The University of Queensland Australia
Queensland University of Technology Australia
The University of Sydney Australia
UNSW Sydney Australia
Macquarie University Australia
University of Technology Sydney Australia
University of Newcastle Australia Australia
University of Wollongong Australia
Western Sydney University Australia
University of New England Australia
Griffith University relative to The University of Queensland Australia The University of Queensland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
The University of Queensland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Griffith University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Griffith University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Griffith University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Griffith University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Griffith University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Griffith University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Griffith University at the time of their publication.

About Griffith University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Griffith University have published 67.2k papers, which have received a total of 2.0M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 162 papers in Research and Theory, 295 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, 641 papers in Public Administration, 7.9k papers in Sociology and Political Science and 412 papers in Human Factors and Ergonomics on the topics of Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (1.0k papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (901 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (656 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (630 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (604 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (575 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (563 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (563 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Marketing (60.2k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (58.5k citations), Ecology (142.6k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (64.2k citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (8.0k citations). Authors at Griffith University collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, The Science of The Total Environment, BMJ Open and Australian Critical Care. Some of Griffith University's most productive authors include Seyedali Mirjalili, Andrew W. Lewis, Ralf Buckley, Stephen Richard Billett, Huijun Zhao, Seyed Mohammad Mirjalili, Paresh Kumar Narayan, Stuart Edward Bunn, Angela H. Arthington and Denise F. Polit.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact