University of Technology Sydney

1.9M citations
68.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of Technology Sydney

60.3k papers receiving 1.8M citations

Peers

University of Technology Sydney
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Water Science and Technology 91.9k
  • Pollution 67.7k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 125.9k
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 48.6k
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 76.0k
Replace UNSW Sydney with:
UNSW Sydney Australia
University of Wollongong Australia
University of Newcastle Australia Australia
Monash University Australia
The University of Queensland Australia
The University of Melbourne Australia
Griffith University Australia
Queensland University of Technology Australia
Macquarie University Australia
RMIT University Australia
University of Technology Sydney relative to UNSW Sydney Australia UNSW Sydney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
UNSW Sydney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Technology Sydney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Technology Sydney. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Technology Sydney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Technology Sydney more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Technology Sydney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Technology Sydney at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Technology Sydney at the time of their publication.

About University of Technology Sydney

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Technology Sydney have published 68.5k papers, which have received a total of 1.9M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 161 papers in Research and Theory, 4.3k papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 6.5k papers in Artificial Intelligence, 1.6k papers in Finance and 2.1k papers in Water Science and Technology on the topics of Membrane Separation Technologies (1.1k papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (744 papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (736 papers), Antenna Design and Analysis (709 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (617 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (599 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (589 papers) and Electric Motor Design and Analysis (567 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Water Science and Technology (91.9k citations), Pollution (67.7k citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (125.9k citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (48.6k citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (76.0k citations). Authors at University of Technology Sydney collaborate with scholars in Australia, China and United States and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, IEEE Access, Scientific Reports, The Science of The Total Environment and Bioresource Technology. Some of University of Technology Sydney's most productive authors include Yiu‐Wing Mai, Guoxiu Wang, Huu Hao Ngo, Dacheng Tao, Yi Yang, Christian M. Ringle, Wenshan Guo, Marko Sarstedt, Biswajeet Pradhan and Joe F. Hair.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact