University of Newcastle Australia

1.5M citations
51.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of Newcastle Australia

44.6k papers receiving 1.3M citations

Peers

University of Newcastle Australia
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Marketing 37.3k
  • Pollution 41.2k
  • Water Science and Technology 46.4k
  • Control and Systems Engineering 73.5k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 80.6k
Replace The University of Sydney with:
The University of Sydney Australia
UNSW Sydney Australia
University of Technology Sydney Australia
University of Wollongong Australia
Western Sydney University Australia
Queensland University of Technology Australia
Griffith University Australia
The University of Queensland Australia
Macquarie University Australia
The University of Melbourne Australia
University of Newcastle Australia relative to The University of Sydney Australia The University of Sydney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
The University of Sydney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Newcastle Australia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Newcastle Australia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Newcastle Australia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Newcastle Australia more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Newcastle Australia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Newcastle Australia at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Newcastle Australia at the time of their publication.

About University of Newcastle Australia

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Newcastle Australia have published 51.4k papers, which have received a total of 1.5M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.9k papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 2.5k papers in General Health Professions, 2.5k papers in Control and Systems Engineering, 672 papers in Health and 405 papers in Applied Psychology on the topics of Control Systems and Identification (793 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (678 papers), Advanced Control Systems Optimization (650 papers), Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems (567 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (548 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (523 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (514 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (438 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Marketing (37.3k citations), Pollution (41.2k citations), Water Science and Technology (46.4k citations), Control and Systems Engineering (73.5k citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (80.6k citations). Authors at University of Newcastle Australia collaborate with scholars in Australia, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including The Medical Journal of Australia, PLoS ONE, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, BMJ Open and Automatica. Some of University of Newcastle Australia's most productive authors include Marko Sarstedt, Christian M. Ringle, Jörg Henseler, R. John Aitken, Scott W. Sloan, Robert E. Melchers, R. A. Antonia, Nikolai Bogduk, Graham C. Goodwin and Brian D. O. Anderson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact