University of New England

564.5k citations
19.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of New England

18.0k papers receiving 526.2k citations

Peers

University of New England
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Animal Science and Zoology 45.1k
  • Ecological Modeling 13.3k
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 30.5k
  • Ecology 77.2k
  • Paleontology 19.8k
Replace Griffith University with:
Griffith University Australia
Macquarie University Australia
Charles Sturt University Australia
Western Sydney University Australia
University of Wollongong Australia
La Trobe University Australia
Australian Research Council Australia
University of Canberra Australia
University of Tasmania Australia
James Cook University Australia
University of New England relative to Griffith University Australia Griffith University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.4×
Griffith University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of New England

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of New England. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of New England with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of New England more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of New England

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of New England at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of New England at the time of their publication.

About University of New England

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of New England have published 19.9k papers, which have received a total of 564.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.7k papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 786 papers in Small Animals, 1.1k papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 705 papers in Paleontology and 2.4k papers in Ecology on the topics of Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (1.2k papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (906 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (585 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (585 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (556 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (510 papers), Plant and animal studies (467 papers) and Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (437 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Animal Science and Zoology (45.1k citations), Ecological Modeling (13.3k citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (30.5k citations), Ecology (77.2k citations) and Paleontology (19.8k citations). Authors at University of New England collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Animal Production Science, PLoS ONE, Poultry Science, Australian Veterinary Journal and Journal of Animal Science. Some of University of New England's most productive authors include George E. Battese, Ian Metcalfe, Lesley J. Rogers, Fritz Geiser, Lalit Kumar, Tim Coelli, Mark A. Spackman, Karin Meyer, Timothy Coelli and Klaus Rohde.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact