Australian Critical Care

1.4k papers and 14.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Australian Critical Care in the last decades have received a total of 14.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Australian Critical Care usually cover Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (459 papers), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (382 papers) and Emergency Medicine (251 papers) specifically the topics of Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (381 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (376 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (153 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australian Critical Care are Wendy Chaboyer, Leanne M. Aitken, Marion Mitchell, Andrea P. Marshall, Doug Elliott, Nicole B. Groves, Antony Tobin, Fiona Coyer, Gavin Leslie and Melissa J. Bloomer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Australian Critical Care

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Australian Critical Care. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australian Critical Care.

Countries where authors publish in Australian Critical Care

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australian Critical Care. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australian Critical Care with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian Critical Care more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025