Western Sydney University

33.3k papers receiving 908.4k citations

Peers

Western Sydney University
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Research and Theory 3.3k
  • Clinical Psychology 68.5k
  • Soil Science 30.5k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 40.5k
  • Global and Planetary Change 66.8k
Replace University of Newcastle Australia with:
University of Newcastle Australia Australia
University of Technology Sydney Australia
University of Wollongong Australia
Griffith University Australia
UNSW Sydney Australia
Macquarie University Australia
University of New England Australia
Queensland University of Technology Australia
La Trobe University Australia
Monash University Australia
Western Sydney University relative to University of Newcastle Australia Australia University of Newcastle Australia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
University of Newcastle Australia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Western Sydney University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Western Sydney University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Western Sydney University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Western Sydney University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Western Sydney University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Western Sydney University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Western Sydney University at the time of their publication.

About Western Sydney University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Western Sydney University have published 39.0k papers, which have received a total of 1.0M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 167 papers in Research and Theory, 2.2k papers in Clinical Psychology, 1.3k papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 1.3k papers in Building and Construction and 1.9k papers in Social Psychology on the topics of Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (798 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (567 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (525 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (463 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (453 papers), Plant and animal studies (428 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (415 papers) and Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete (383 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Research and Theory (3.3k citations), Clinical Psychology (68.5k citations), Soil Science (30.5k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (40.5k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (66.8k citations). Authors at Western Sydney University collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Scientific Reports, BMJ Open and New Phytologist. Some of Western Sydney University's most productive authors include Herbert W. Marsh, Wei Xing Zheng, Peter B. Reich, Vivian W.Y. Tam, Brajesh K. Singh, Kit‐Tai Hau, Y. Xiang, Phillipa Hay, John Cairney and Debra Jackson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact