College Board

8.6k citations
438 papers ·

Impact in

  • Education top 10%
    • Higher Education Research Studies
    • School Choice and Performance
    • Psychological Testing and Assessment

Papers in

College Board

356 papers receiving 8.0k citations

Peers

College Board
Comparison fields: 5 of 210
  • Education 3.0k
  • Applied Psychology 416
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 927
  • Management Science and Operations Research 894
  • Safety Research 558
Replace Human Resources Research Organization with:
Human Resources Research Organization United States
Community College of Philadelphia United States
United States Office of Personnel Management United States
New York City Department of Education United States
College of Saint Rose United States
Child Trends United States
Wheelock College United States
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Canada
Dowling College United States
Learning Partnership Canada
College Board relative to Human Resources Research Organization United States Human Resources Research Organization's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Human Resources Research Organization · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at College Board

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at College Board. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at College Board with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites College Board more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at College Board

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with College Board at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with College Board at the time of their publication.

About College Board

In recent decades, authors affiliated with College Board have published 438 papers, which have received a total of 8.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 169 papers in Education, 58 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 27 papers in Safety Research, 18 papers in Computer Science Applications and 34 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology on the topics of Higher Education Research Studies (92 papers), School Choice and Performance (50 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (49 papers), Innovations in Educational Methods (21 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (17 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (15 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (14 papers) and Teaching and Learning Programming (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Education (3.0k citations), Applied Psychology (416 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (927 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (894 citations) and Safety Research (558 citations). Authors at College Board collaborate with scholars in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Educational Measurement Issues and Practice, Economics of Education Review, Journal of Educational Measurement, Educational and Psychological Measurement and Applied Measurement in Education. Some of College Board's most productive authors include Carol B. Aslanian, Howard T. Everson, Jonathan Smith, Michael Hurwitz, Roger E. Millsap, Wayne J. Camara, Jasper Knoester, Emily J. Shaw, Sigmund Tobias and Lynn Arthur Steen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact