Economics of Education Review

2.6k papers and 79.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in Economics of Education Review in the last decades have received a total of 79.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Economics of Education Review usually cover Education (1.7k papers), Economics and Econometrics (965 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (672 papers) specifically the topics of School Choice and Performance (1.2k papers), Higher Education Research Studies (691 papers) and Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (527 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Economics of Education Review are Eric A. Hanushek, Joop Hartog, James D. Unnever, Jill Johnes, Helen F. Ladd, Amanda L. Griffith, Wim Groot, David H. Monk, John Robst and Ronald G. Ehrenberg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Economics of Education Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Economics of Education Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Economics of Education Review.

Countries where authors publish in Economics of Education Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Economics of Education Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Economics of Education Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Economics of Education Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025