New York City Department of Education

7.9k citations
568 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

New York City Department of Education

420 papers receiving 5.9k citations

Peers

New York City Department of Education
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.3k
  • Clinical Psychology 1.6k
  • Education 2.2k
  • Safety Research 414
  • Social Psychology 942
Replace Lesley University with:
Lesley University United States
East Stroudsburg University United States
Western Connecticut State University United States
College of Saint Rose United States
State Board of Education United States
College Board United States
College of New Rochelle United States
Elizabethtown College United States
Empire State University United States
Wheelock College United States
New York City Department of Education relative to Lesley University United States Lesley University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lesley University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at New York City Department of Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at New York City Department of Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at New York City Department of Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New York City Department of Education more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at New York City Department of Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with New York City Department of Education at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with New York City Department of Education at the time of their publication.

About New York City Department of Education

In recent decades, authors affiliated with New York City Department of Education have published 568 papers, which have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 8 papers in General Psychology, 75 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 146 papers in Education, 21 papers in Linguistics and Language and 56 papers in Clinical Psychology on the topics of Educational and Psychological Assessments (22 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (22 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (20 papers), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (19 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (18 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (17 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (17 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (16 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.3k citations), Clinical Psychology (1.6k citations), Education (2.2k citations), Safety Research (414 citations) and Social Psychology (942 citations). Authors at New York City Department of Education collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Exceptional Children, American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Science Education, Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education and American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. Some of New York City Department of Education's most productive authors include Barry J. Zimmerman, Hope J. Hartman, Angela J. Narayan, Alicia F. Lieberman, William W. Harris, Herbert P. Ginsburg, Joanna Cannon, Jacob Cohen, Harold N. Levinson and Luisa M. Rivera.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact