Will Wright

18 papers receiving 952 citations

Will Wright's Hit Papers

A Theory of Fun for Game Design 2004 · 752 citations
7520+7+14Years since publication250500750

Peers

Will Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 481
  • Computer Science Applications 120
  • Human-Computer Interaction 106
  • Communication 96
  • Sociology and Political Science 550
Replace Celia Pearce with:
Celia Pearce United States
Roger Caillois
Ronald Soetaert Belgium
Jesper Juul Denmark
Suzanne K. Damarin United States
T. L. Taylor Denmark
Nicola Yelland Australia
James A. Levin United States
Mark J. P. Wolf United States
Aaron Doering United States
Will Wright relative to Celia Pearce United States Celia Pearce's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Celia Pearce · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Will Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Will Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Will Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Will Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Will Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Will Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Will Wright. The network helps show where Will Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Will Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Will Wright Line = papers co-authored together Will Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1
A Theory of Fun for Game Design
Hit paper breakdown →
2004752
2 1992154
3 1975103
4 199384
5 199331
6 200119
7
The Social Logic of Health
198215
8 197712
9 20053
10 20223
11 19803
12 20022
13 19832
14 20171
15
KRAZY! : the delirious world of anime + comics + video games + art
20081
16
The Civil Service Reform Plan 2012: One Year On
20131
17 20181
18 20171
19 20050

About Will Wright

Will Wright is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, History, Social Psychology, Geography, Planning and Development and Small Animals, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Environmental and Regional History (3 papers), Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies (2 papers), American Literature and Culture (2 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (1 paper), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (1 paper), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (1 paper) and American History and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (481 citations), Computer Science Applications (120 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (106 citations), Communication (96 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (550 citations). Will Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Tamar Liebes, Elihu Katz, Richard Slotkin, Jennifer L. Croissant, B. T. King, Augustine Brannigan, Daniel Martin Weary, Marina von Keyserlingk, Heidi Tworek and Peter Alan Thomas. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Journal of Popular Film and Television, Social Forces, Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences and Environmental History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact