Peter A. Thomas

95 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Peter A. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 858
  • Global and Planetary Change 802
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 605
  • Ecological Modeling 129
  • Atmospheric Science 535
Replace Marco Ferretti with:
Marco Ferretti Italy
Daniel J. Murphy Australia
Harald G. Zechmeister Austria
James D. Lewis United States
Liang Chen China
Andrés Etter Colombia
Marcos Adami Brazil
Roger Jones Australia
Anne Tolvanen Finland
Ashley D. Sparrow New Zealand
Peter A. Thomas relative to Marco Ferretti Italy Marco Ferretti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Marco Ferretti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter A. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter A. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter A. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter A. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter A. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter A. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter A. Thomas. The network helps show where Peter A. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter A. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter A. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Peter A. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014317
2 2003231
3 2009157
4 2012148
5
Fire in forestry. Volume 1. Forest fire behavior and effects. Volume 2. Forest fire management and organization.
1983125
6 2007116
7 1997105
8 2020102
9 201597
10 201670
11 201969
12 200752
13 201550
14 199946
15 200046
16 201743
17 201042
18 201541
19 199139
20 202139

About Peter A. Thomas

Peter A. Thomas is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Plant Science, Global and Planetary Change and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 102 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (18 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (13 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (10 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (9 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (8 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (7 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (7 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (858 citations), Global and Planetary Change (802 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (605 citations), Ecological Modeling (129 citations) and Atmospheric Science (535 citations). Peter A. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Poland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Polwart, Jonathan G. A. Lageard, Andrew Hacket‐Pain, John R. Packham, Ross W. Wein, Michał Bogdziewicz, William J. de Groot, Dave Kelly, Thomas Degen and M. D. Atkinson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ecology, Trees, Tree Physiology, Biological Conservation and Ecology and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact