W Peacock

528 citations
32 papers · 393 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Horticultural and Viticultural Research 23
    • Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 13
    • Fermentation and Sensory Analysis 12
    • Food Quality and Safety Studies 2

W Peacock

29 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers

W Peacock
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 25
  • Plant Science 336
  • Food Science 139
  • Soil Science 57
  • Insect Science 70
Replace Carl Bogdanoff with:
Carl Bogdanoff Canada
Kay Ryugo United States
William C. Olien United States
Celso Valdevino Pommer Brazil
Matthias Frisch Germany
W. Koblet United States
Maurilo Monteiro Terra Brazil
J.M. Pech Australia
E. Bartra Spain
Russell Smithyman United States
W Peacock relative to Carl Bogdanoff Canada Carl Bogdanoff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Carl Bogdanoff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W Peacock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W Peacock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W Peacock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W Peacock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W Peacock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W Peacock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W Peacock. The network helps show where W Peacock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W Peacock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W Peacock Line = papers co-authored together W Peacock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200173
2 197932
3 198930
4
Chemicals losing effect against grape mealybug
198227
5 200625
6 199423
7 198720
8 197716
9 199115
10 197715
11 197514
12 197714
13 197512
14 200211
15 19779
16 20059
17 20059
18
Dimethoate-resistant spider mite predator survives field tests
19807
19 19756
20 19805

About W Peacock

W Peacock is a scholar working on Plant Science, Food Science, Soil Science, Cell Biology and Insect Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Horticultural and Viticultural Research (23 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (13 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (12 papers), Irrigation Practices and Water Management (6 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (5 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (4 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (3 papers) and Food Quality and Safety Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (25 citations), Plant Science (336 citations), Food Science (139 citations), Soil Science (57 citations) and Insect Science (70 citations). W Peacock has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Nick Dokoozlian, L. Peter Christensen, George Leavitt, D. L. Flaherty, Marjorie A. Hoy, Lars Porskjær Christensen, F. E. Broadbent, Robert H. Beede, Roy S. Rauschkolb and Larry J. Bettiga. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, Plant Disease, HortScience, California Agriculture and Journal of Economic Entomology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact