D. L. Flaherty

1000 citations
40 papers · 699 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

D. L. Flaherty

39 papers receiving 578 citations

Peers

D. L. Flaherty
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Insect Science 604
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 318
  • Plant Science 307
  • Horticulture 5
  • Ecology 110
Replace W. E. Styer with:
W. E. Styer United States
H. N. Pitre United States
A. I. Mohyuddin Pakistan
Adair Stoner United States
Arthur M. Agnello United States
Kevin A. Shufran United States
George Tamaki United States
N. E. A. Scopes United Kingdom
Terry A. Stasny United States
Nicola A. Irvin United States
D. L. Flaherty relative to W. E. Styer United States W. E. Styer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
W. E. Styer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D. L. Flaherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. L. Flaherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. L. Flaherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. L. Flaherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. L. Flaherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. L. Flaherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. L. Flaherty. The network helps show where D. L. Flaherty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D. L. Flaherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D. L. Flaherty Line = papers co-authored together D. L. Flaherty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Grape pest management.
199297
2 197160
3 197960
4 197058
5 196948
6 197035
7 197932
8
Chemicals losing effect against grape mealybug
198227
9 199727
10 197025
11 198421
12
The variegated leafhopper, an increasing pest of grapes
198619
13 198819
14 196618
15 197715
16 198514
17 197512
18 199612
19 198910
20 19869

About D. L. Flaherty

D. L. Flaherty is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Plant Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 40 papers that have together received 699 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (38 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (18 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (12 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (11 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Study of Mite Species (6 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (6 papers) and Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (604 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (318 citations), Plant Science (307 citations), Horticulture (5 citations) and Ecology (110 citations). D. L. Flaherty has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Marjorie A. Hoy, C. B. Huffaker, C. E. Kennett, R. W. Hoffmann, A. N. Kasimatis, W. J. Moller, W Peacock, L. T. Wilson, Frank G. Zalom and Rachid Hanna. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Entomology, Journal of Economic Entomology, California Agriculture, BioControl and American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact