California Agriculture

3.1k papers and 20.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.1k papers published in California Agriculture in the last decades have received a total of 20.0k indexed citations. Papers published in California Agriculture usually cover Plant Science (1.5k papers), Insect Science (562 papers) and Ecology (352 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (383 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (353 papers) and Horticultural and Viticultural Research (284 papers). The most active scholars publishing in California Agriculture are Mark E. Grismer, Blaine Hanson, Phil A. Phillips, Matthew J. Blua, J. Letey, Kent M. Daane, W. W. Barnett, Steve Orloff, M. P. Parrella and Adina M. Merenlender.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in California Agriculture

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in California Agriculture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in California Agriculture.

Countries where authors publish in California Agriculture

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in California Agriculture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in California Agriculture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites California Agriculture more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025