Thomas Höge

43 papers receiving 920 citations

Peers

Thomas Höge
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 370
  • Applied Psychology 119
  • Social Psychology 344
  • General Health Professions 367
  • Clinical Psychology 252
Replace François Courcy with:
François Courcy Canada
Maura J. Mills United States
Chan M. Hellman United States
Jessica van Wingerden Netherlands
Christine A. Sprigg United Kingdom
M. Gloria González‐Morales Canada
Maree Roche New Zealand
Jan A. Feij Netherlands
Francis Cheung Hong Kong
Evelyne Fouquereau France
Thomas Höge relative to François Courcy Canada François Courcy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
François Courcy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Höge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Höge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Höge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Höge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Höge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Höge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Höge. The network helps show where Thomas Höge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Höge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Höge Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Höge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013134
2 2008104
3 201788
4 201958
5 200456
6 201943
7 200436
8 201734
9 201833
10 201331
11 201730
12 201230
13 202029
14 200828
15 201526
16 202025
17 201925
18 201921
19 201920
20 201917

About Thomas Höge

Thomas Höge is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 989 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (16 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (13 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (9 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (8 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (6 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (5 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (370 citations), Applied Psychology (119 citations), Social Psychology (344 citations), General Health Professions (367 citations) and Clinical Psychology (252 citations). Thomas Höge has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Höfer, Alexandra Huber, Cornelia Strecker, André Büssing, Tatjana Schnell, Melanie Häusler, Wolfgang Weber, Christine Unterrainer, Severin Hornung and Beatriz Sora. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, Economic and Industrial Democracy, Applied Psychology and The Journal of Positive Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact