Chan M. Hellman

54 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Chan M. Hellman
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Applied Psychology 296
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 275
  • Clinical Psychology 383
  • Social Psychology 324
  • Leadership and Management 17
Replace Evelyne Fouquereau with:
Evelyne Fouquereau France
Jan A. Feij Netherlands
Gisela Mohr Germany
Lisa E. Baranik United States
Maura J. Mills United States
Peter McIlveen Australia
Mark S. Nagy United States
Christine Robitschek United States
Richard K. Ladyshewsky Australia
Thomas Höge Austria
Chan M. Hellman relative to Evelyne Fouquereau France Evelyne Fouquereau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Evelyne Fouquereau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chan M. Hellman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chan M. Hellman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chan M. Hellman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chan M. Hellman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chan M. Hellman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chan M. Hellman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chan M. Hellman. The network helps show where Chan M. Hellman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chan M. Hellman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chan M. Hellman Line = papers co-authored together Chan M. Hellman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997298
2 200384
3 201664
4 201959
5 201258
6 200651
7 200943
8 200834
9 201633
10
Academic Self-Efficacy: Highlighting the First-Generation Student.
199632
11 201632
12 201932
13 202230
14 201829
15 202028
16 201728
17 201827
18 201827
19 200424
20 201222

About Chan M. Hellman

Chan M. Hellman is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (22 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (12 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (11 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (5 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers) and Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (296 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (275 citations), Clinical Psychology (383 citations), Social Psychology (324 citations) and Leadership and Management (17 citations). Chan M. Hellman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ricky T. Muñoz, Jody A. Worley, Peter E. Williams, Dale R. Fuqua, Steve Hoppes, Heather A Hanks, Yafit Sulimani‐Aidan, Eran Melkman, Sarah J. Passmore and Mark D. Fox. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Social Psychology, Child Indicators Research, Research on Social Work Practice, Traumatology An International Journal and Journal of Personality Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact