Economic and Industrial Democracy

1.3k papers and 16.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Economic and Industrial Democracy in the last decades have received a total of 16.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Economic and Industrial Democracy usually cover Public Administration (616 papers), General Health Professions (448 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (377 papers) specifically the topics of Labor Movements and Unions (605 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (430 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (289 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Economic and Industrial Democracy are Hans De Witte, Katharina Näswall, Magnus Sverke, Kari Wærness, Chris Cornforth, Wolfgang Streeck, Erik Berntson, Randy Hodson, Paul Thompson and Elfi Baillien.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Economic and Industrial Democracy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Economic and Industrial Democracy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Economic and Industrial Democracy.

Countries where authors publish in Economic and Industrial Democracy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Economic and Industrial Democracy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Economic and Industrial Democracy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Economic and Industrial Democracy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025