Thomas C. Cross
Impact in
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Emotional Intelligence and Performance
- Cultural Differences and Values
Papers in
-
- Team Dynamics and Performance 2
- Emotional Intelligence and Performance 1
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior 3
- Co-authors
- Stephan J. Motowidlo (2 shared papers)James R. Van Scotter (2 shared papers)Timothy DeGroot (1 shared paper)D. Scott Kiker (1 shared paper)Amir Erez (2 shared papers)Yihao Liu (2 shared papers)Dana R. Vashdi (1 shared paper)Peter Bamberger (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Applied Psychology (2 papers)Human Relations (1 paper)Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration (1 paper)Academy of Management Proceedings (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaIsrael
In The Last Decade
Thomas C. Cross
5 papers receiving 556 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 471
- Social Psychology 195
- Applied Psychology 45
- Leadership and Management 9
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 16
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Cross
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Cross's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Cross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Cross more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Cross
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Cross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Cross. The network helps show where Thomas C. Cross may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Thomas C. Cross, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 354 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 242 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 1 |
About Thomas C. Cross
Thomas C. Cross is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and Clinical Psychology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 647 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (2 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (1 paper), Conflict Management and Negotiation (1 paper), Workplace Violence and Bullying (1 paper), Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies (1 paper) and Problem Solving Skills Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (471 citations), Social Psychology (195 citations), Applied Psychology (45 citations), Leadership and Management (9 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (16 citations). Thomas C. Cross has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Stephan J. Motowidlo, James R. Van Scotter, Timothy DeGroot, D. Scott Kiker, Amir Erez, Yihao Liu, Dana R. Vashdi and Peter Bamberger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Human Relations, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration and Academy of Management Proceedings.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.