Jack K. Ito

16 papers receiving 697 citations

Peers

Jack K. Ito
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 460
  • Social Psychology 233
  • Safety Research 69
  • General Health Professions 192
  • Public Administration 22
Replace Edward J. Inderrieden with:
Edward J. Inderrieden United States
Andreas Liefooghe United Kingdom
Samantha A. Conroy United States
Susan M. Burroughs United States
Mark M. Suazo United States
Vicente Martínez‐Tur Spain
Jaclyn M. Jensen United States
Charissa Freese Netherlands
Silvia Dello Russo Italy
Denise M. Jepsen Australia
Jack K. Ito relative to Edward J. Inderrieden United States Edward J. Inderrieden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Edward J. Inderrieden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack K. Ito

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack K. Ito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack K. Ito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack K. Ito more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack K. Ito

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack K. Ito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack K. Ito. The network helps show where Jack K. Ito may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Jack K. Ito, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack K. Ito Line = papers co-authored together Jack K. Ito links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2003281
2 2005154
3 200775
4 198648
5 200147
6 201344
7 200729
8 200324
9 201021
10 201216
11 200810
12 20096
13 20066
14 19944
15 19863
16 19812

About Jack K. Ito

Jack K. Ito is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research and Strategy and Management, having authored 16 papers that have together received 770 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (10 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (2 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers), Employer Branding and e-HRM (2 papers), International Business and FDI (2 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (460 citations), Social Psychology (233 citations), Safety Research (69 citations), General Health Professions (192 citations) and Public Administration (22 citations). Jack K. Ito has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Céleste M. Brotheridge, Robert B. Anderson, Jean-Marie Nkongolo-Bakenda and Richard B. Peterson. Their work appears in journals such as Public Personnel Management, Career Development International, Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Vocational Behavior and Journal of Managerial Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact