Théo Efstathiou
Impact in
- Food Science top 10%
- Proteins in Food Systems
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Papers in
-
- Phytoestrogen effects and research 7
-
- Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress 4
- Co-authors
- Abalo Awade (1 shared paper)Farzad Pakdel (6 shared papers)Sylvain Lecomte (6 shared papers)Thu Ha Pham (3 shared papers)François Ferrière (4 shared papers)Christian Saligaut (2 shared papers)M Lelong (2 shared papers)Didier Dupont (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Théo Efstathiou
13 papers receiving 352 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Food Science 107
- Nutrition and Dietetics 51
- Biotechnology 29
- Animal Science and Zoology 34
- Biochemistry 19
Countries citing papers authored by Théo Efstathiou
This map shows the geographic impact of Théo Efstathiou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Théo Efstathiou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Théo Efstathiou more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Théo Efstathiou
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Théo Efstathiou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Théo Efstathiou. The network helps show where Théo Efstathiou may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Théo Efstathiou, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 83 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 14 | Étude comparative des teneurs en isoflavones dans des graines de soja, des extraits de graines de soja et des compléments alimentaires | 2008 | 0 |
| 15 | BIODISPONIBILITÉ DES ISOFLAVONES DU SOJA AU COURS D'UNE SUPPLÉMENTATION CHEZ DES FEMMES MÉNOPAUSÉES | 2008 | 0 |
| 16 | 2024 | 0 |
About Théo Efstathiou
Théo Efstathiou is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology, Food Science, Plant Science and Physiology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytoestrogen effects and research (7 papers), Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress (4 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (2 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (2 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (2 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (2 papers) and Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (107 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (51 citations), Biotechnology (29 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (34 citations) and Biochemistry (19 citations). Théo Efstathiou has collaborated with scholars based in France and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Abalo Awade, Farzad Pakdel, Sylvain Lecomte, Thu Ha Pham, François Ferrière, Christian Saligaut, M Lelong, Didier Dupont, Frédéric Chalmel and Élise Dumont. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrients, Food & Function, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Food Additives & Contaminants and The Journal of Urology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.