Food Additives & Contaminants

2.3k papers and 73.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Food Additives & Contaminants in the last decades have received a total of 73.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Food Additives & Contaminants usually cover Plant Science (766 papers), Food Science (715 papers) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (549 papers) specifically the topics of Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (536 papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (404 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (266 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Food Additives & Contaminants are Laurence Castle, Ron Walker, A.G. Renwick, Peter Scott, Hans P. van Egmond, John Gilbert, K. A. Scudamore, Jean A.T. Pennington, D.M.W. Anderson and Roland Franz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Food Additives & Contaminants

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Food Additives & Contaminants. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Food Additives & Contaminants.

Countries where authors publish in Food Additives & Contaminants

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Food Additives & Contaminants. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Food Additives & Contaminants with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Food Additives & Contaminants more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025