Frédéric Chalmel

106 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Frédéric Chalmel
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Reproductive Medicine 1.1k
  • Physiology 159
  • Molecular Biology 1.4k
  • Cancer Research 283
  • Otorhinolaryngology 111
Replace Qinghua Shi with:
Qinghua Shi China
Xia Sheng China
Jiang Liu China
Masami Nozaki Japan
Andrea Münsterberg United Kingdom
Beatrice L. Griffiths United Kingdom
Ramesh S. Pillai Switzerland
Noora Kotaja Finland
Yang Gao China
Wei Wen Deng China
Frédéric Chalmel relative to Qinghua Shi China Qinghua Shi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Qinghua Shi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Chalmel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Chalmel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Chalmel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Chalmel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Chalmel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Chalmel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Chalmel. The network helps show where Frédéric Chalmel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Chalmel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Chalmel Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Chalmel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 110 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004361
2 2010251
3 2003233
4 2007219
5 2008154
6 2021134
7 2010110
8 2014100
9 201498
10 201278
11 200777
12 200975
13 201575
14 200874
15 201969
16 201967
17 201562
18 200760
19 201360
20 201557

About Frédéric Chalmel

Frédéric Chalmel is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Cancer Research, having authored 110 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sperm and Testicular Function (38 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (11 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (10 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (9 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (6 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (5 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (5 papers) and Gene expression and cancer classification (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (1.1k citations), Physiology (159 citations), Molecular Biology (1.4k citations), Cancer Research (283 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (111 citations). Frédéric Chalmel has collaborated with scholars based in France, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Michael Primig, Bernard Jégou, Antoine Dominique Rolland, Aurélie Lardenois, Olivier Poch, Bertrand Evrard, Thierry Léveillard, José‐Alain Sahel, Jacques Samarut and Nathalie Allioli. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, PLoS ONE, Human Reproduction, Biology of Reproduction and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact