T. Shaffer

18 papers receiving 223 citations

Peers

T. Shaffer
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Family Practice 8
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 49
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 10
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 19
  • General Health Professions 52
Replace Amanda Baker with:
Amanda Baker Australia
Nataly R. Espinoza Suárez United States
Frances A. Chan United States
Regina Grebla United States
Barbara Robertson United States
Céline Buffel du Vaure France
Sid Feldman Canada
Sue Fosnight United States
Micaela Jantzi Canada
Sumeet Kalia Canada
T. Shaffer relative to Amanda Baker Australia Amanda Baker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Amanda Baker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. Shaffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Shaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Shaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Shaffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Shaffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Shaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Shaffer. The network helps show where T. Shaffer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. Shaffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. Shaffer Line = papers co-authored together T. Shaffer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200877
2 199937
3 201034
4 198527
5 201818
6 201410
7 20107
8 20115
9 20145
10 20134
11
Specialty of principal care physician and Medicare expenditures in patients with coronary artery disease: impact of comorbidity and severity.
20013
12 20112
13 20122
14 20152
15 20112
16 20121
17 20121
18 20091
19 20111
20 20150

About T. Shaffer

T. Shaffer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics, Emergency Medicine and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 22 papers that have together received 239 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (9 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (3 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (2 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (8 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (49 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (10 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (19 citations) and General Health Professions (52 citations). T. Shaffer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Ilene H. Zuckerman, Masayo Sato, Limin Zhao, Priscilla T. Ryder, Jane M. Simoni, Alicia I. Arbaje, Wendy E. Weller, Neil R. Powe, Julie Krop and Christopher D. Saudek. Their work appears in journals such as The Annals of Family Medicine, The Gerontologist, Classical and Quantum Gravity, Journal of Clinical Oncology and The Journals of Gerontology Series B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact