T. Shaffer

18 papers receiving 214 citations

Peers

T. Shaffer
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 31
  • Family Practice 17
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 64
  • General Health Professions 92
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 5
Replace Sílvia Regina Mendes Pereira with:
Sílvia Regina Mendes Pereira Brazil
Sue Fosnight United States
Sumeet Kalia Canada
Deborah Bowman Australia
Mark A. Austen United States
Barbara Robertson United States
Julie O’Halloran Australia
Céline Buffel du Vaure France
Allan T. Daly United States
Mi Hwa Won South Korea
T. Shaffer relative to Sílvia Regina Mendes Pereira Brazil Sílvia Regina Mendes Pereira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Sílvia Regina Mendes Pereira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. Shaffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Shaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Shaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Shaffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Shaffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Shaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Shaffer. The network helps show where T. Shaffer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. Shaffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. Shaffer Line = papers co-authored together T. Shaffer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200875
2 199937
3 201030
4 198527
5 201817
6 20149
7 20106
8 20145
9 20115
10 20134
11
Specialty of principal care physician and Medicare expenditures in patients with coronary artery disease: impact of comorbidity and severity.
20013
12 20152
13 20122
14 20112
15 20112
16 20091
17 20121
18 20111
19 20121
20 20150

About T. Shaffer

T. Shaffer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Emergency Medicine and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 22 papers that have together received 230 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (11 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (2 papers) and Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (31 citations), Family Practice (17 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (64 citations), General Health Professions (92 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (5 citations). T. Shaffer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Masayo Sato, Ilene H. Zuckerman, Limin Zhao, Jane M. Simoni, Priscilla T. Ryder, Alicia I. Arbaje, Wendy E. Weller, Julie Krop, Neil R. Powe and Christopher D. Saudek. Their work appears in journals such as The Annals of Family Medicine, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Diabetes Care, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise and Classical and Quantum Gravity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact