Emergency Medicine

559.9k papers and 10.5M indexed citations i.

About

559.9k papers covering Emergency Medicine have received a total of 10.5M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation, Emergency and Acute Care Studies and Trauma and Emergency Care Studies and also cover the fields of Surgery, Epidemiology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Surgery, Epidemiology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Some of the most active scholars covering Emergency Medicine are Mary E. Charlson, C. Ronald MacKenzie, Peter Pompei, Kathy L. Aleš, Daniel Dindo, Nicolas Demartines, Pierre-Alain Clavien, Michael A. Matthay, Paul H. Sugarbaker and Derek M. Yellon.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Emergency Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Emergency Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Emergency Medicine.

Countries where authors publish papers about Emergency Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Emergency Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Emergency Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emergency Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025