Classical and Quantum Gravity

209.5k citations
9.9k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
    • Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
    • Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
    • Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
    • Advanced Differential Geometry Research
    • Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

Papers in

    • Black Holes and Theoretical Physics 6.2k
    • Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 6.1k
    • Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 2.3k
    • Advanced Differential Geometry Research 911
    • Relativity and Gravitational Theory 897
    • Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 793

Classical and Quantum Gravity

9.4k papers receiving 201.1k citations

Peers

Classical and Quantum Gravity
Comparison fields: 5 of 182
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 145.5k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 172.6k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 68.0k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 30.9k
  • Oceanography 10.0k
Replace Physical review. D with:
Physical review. D United States
Physics Reports United States
Annals of Physics United States
The European Physical Journal C Germany
Progress of Theoretical Physics Japan
General Relativity and Gravitation United States
Lecture notes in physics United States
Computer Physics Communications United States
Reviews of Modern Physics United States
Physica Scripta China
Classical and Quantum Gravity relative to Physical review. D United States Physical review. D's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Physical review. D · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Classical and Quantum Gravity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Classical and Quantum Gravity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Classical and Quantum Gravity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Classical and Quantum Gravity more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Classical and Quantum Gravity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Classical and Quantum Gravity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Classical and Quantum Gravity.

About Classical and Quantum Gravity

The 9.9k papers published in Classical and Quantum Gravity in the last decades have received a total of 209.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Classical and Quantum Gravity usually cover Nuclear and High Energy Physics (6.5k papers), Astronomy and Astrophysics (8.1k papers), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (3.2k papers), Applied Mathematics (602 papers) and Oceanography (666 papers) specifically the topics of Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (6.2k papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (6.1k papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (2.4k papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (2.3k papers), Advanced Differential Geometry Research (911 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (897 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (793 papers) and Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect (711 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Classical and Quantum Gravity are Abhay Ashtekar, Thomas Thiemann, Matt Visser, Jerzy Lewandowski, Martin Bojowald, Carlo Rovelli, Sean A. Hartnoll, Claus Kiefer, Gregory M Harry and Brian P. Dolan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact