The Annals of Family Medicine

2.1k papers and 76.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in The Annals of Family Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 76.8k indexed citations. Papers published in The Annals of Family Medicine usually cover General Health Professions (1.2k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (500 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (471 papers) specifically the topics of Primary Care and Health Outcomes (749 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (377 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (190 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Annals of Family Medicine are Becki Weiss, Martin Fortin, T. Bodenheimer, John Saultz, Christine A. Sinsky, Benjamin F. Crabtree, Arch G. Mainous, Truls Østbye, Paul A. Nutting and Elizabeth A. Bayliss.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Annals of Family Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Annals of Family Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Annals of Family Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in The Annals of Family Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Annals of Family Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Annals of Family Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Annals of Family Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025