Steve Fuller

308 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Steve Fuller
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
  • History and Philosophy of Science 777
  • Philosophy 572
  • General Psychology 55
  • Health Informatics 43
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.5k
Replace Charles Bazerman with:
Charles Bazerman United States
Joseph Agassi Israel
Peter Weingart Germany
Jonathan Osborne United States
Annette C. Baier United States
Philip E. Tetlock United States
Denis Hilton France
Helen E. Longino United States
David B. Burrell United States
Lorraine Daston Germany
Steve Fuller relative to Charles Bazerman United States Charles Bazerman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Charles Bazerman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Fuller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Fuller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Fuller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Fuller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Fuller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Fuller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Fuller. The network helps show where Steve Fuller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steve Fuller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steve Fuller Line = papers co-authored together Steve Fuller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 365 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994255
2 2001237
3 2008177
4 2012171
5 2018140
6 2023119
7 2001114
8
The Governance of Science
199996
9 200693
10 201587
11
Post-Truth: Knowledge As A Power Game
201881
12 201477
13 199374
14 200273
15 201871
16 199469
17 201169
18 199567
19
The Proactionary Imperative: A Foundation for Transhumanism
201463
20 199162

About Steve Fuller

Steve Fuller is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 365 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (54 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (26 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (23 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (23 papers), Digital Education and Society (19 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (18 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (16 papers) and Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (777 citations), Philosophy (572 citations), General Psychology (55 citations), Health Informatics (43 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.5k citations). Steve Fuller has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Carpenter, Petar Jandrić, Steven Shapin, Michael Lynch, Thomas F. Gieryn, Stéphan Fuchs, William R. Shadish, Cheryl Hardy, Derek Robbins and Pat Thomson. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of the Social Sciences, History of the Human Sciences, Social Epistemology, Social Studies of Science and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact