Steve Fuller

254 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Steve Fuller
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
  • History and Philosophy of Science 611
  • Philosophy 418
  • General Psychology 44
  • Health Informatics 37
  • Communication 197
Replace Charles Bazerman with:
Charles Bazerman United States
Joseph Agassi Israel
Helen E. Longino United States
Peter Weingart Germany
Karin D. Knorr-Cetina United States
N. W. Storer United States
Mario Biagioli United States
Simon Schaffer United Kingdom
Theodore M. Porter United States
Denis Hilton France
Steve Fuller relative to Charles Bazerman United States Charles Bazerman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Charles Bazerman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Fuller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Fuller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Fuller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Fuller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Fuller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Fuller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Fuller. The network helps show where Steve Fuller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steve Fuller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steve Fuller Line = papers co-authored together Steve Fuller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 296 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001194
2 1994181
3 2008152
4 2012141
5 2018108
6 202397
7 200197
8
The Governance of Science
199977
9 200673
10 201568
11
Post-Truth: Knowledge As A Power Game
201863
12 199561
13 199361
14 199460
15 200260
16 201456
17 199149
18 201849
19 200048
20 201146

About Steve Fuller

Steve Fuller is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 296 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (50 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (19 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (16 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (16 papers), Digital Education and Society (14 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (14 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (12 papers) and Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (611 citations), Philosophy (418 citations), General Psychology (44 citations), Health Informatics (37 citations) and Communication (197 citations). Steve Fuller has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Carpenter, Steven Shapin, Petar Jandrić, Michael Lynch, William R. Shadish, Stéphan Fuchs, Thomas F. Gieryn, Nick Crossley, Cheryl Hardy and Derek Robbins. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of the Social Sciences, History of the Human Sciences, Social Studies of Science, Social Epistemology and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact