J. Daniel Schubert

408 citations
11 papers · 207 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

J. Daniel Schubert

10 papers receiving 191 citations

Peers

J. Daniel Schubert
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Communication 29
  • Music 9
  • Gender Studies 27
  • Sociology and Political Science 110
  • Urban Studies 12
Replace Cécile Deer with:
Cécile Deer United Kingdom
Donald Broady Sweden
Trevor Purvis Canada
Phyllis Pease Chock United States
Teresa L. Ebert United States
Jennifer C. Mueller United States
Jay Gabler United States
Andrea D. Bührmann Germany
Félix V. Matos Rodríguez United States
Karen Kelsky Italy
J. Daniel Schubert relative to Cécile Deer United Kingdom Cécile Deer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Cécile Deer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Daniel Schubert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Daniel Schubert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Daniel Schubert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Daniel Schubert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Daniel Schubert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Daniel Schubert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Daniel Schubert. The network helps show where J. Daniel Schubert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside J. Daniel Schubert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Daniel Schubert Line = papers co-authored together J. Daniel Schubert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2008151
2 200216
3 201214
4 199510
5
Knowledge and Power in Higher Education: A Reader
20009
6
Pochówki żołnierskie w tradycji historycznej do czasów I wojny światowej : powstanie cmentarzy wojskowych
20112
7 19912
8 19951
9
[Modified Grimm-Johanson surgery for lower lip reconstruction].
19851
10 20051
11
Działalność Inspekcji Grobów Wojennych w latach 1915-1918 (przy K.u.K. Armeekorpus-Kommando Przemyśl)
20030

About J. Daniel Schubert

J. Daniel Schubert is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Surgery and Clinical Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 207 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polish Historical and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (1 paper), Social and Cultural Dynamics (1 paper), Political theory and Gramsci (1 paper), Marxism and Critical Theory (1 paper), Music History and Culture (1 paper), European Cultural and National Identity (1 paper) and Diverse Music Education Insights (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (29 citations), Music (9 citations), Gender Studies (27 citations), Sociology and Political Science (110 citations) and Urban Studies (12 citations). J. Daniel Schubert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Cécile Deer, Michael Grenfell, Karl Maton, Derek Robbins, Pat Thomson, Nick Crossley, Cheryl Hardy, Steve Fuller, Richard Harvey Brown and George Ritzer. Their work appears in journals such as American Behavioral Scientist, Sociological Perspectives, The Oral History Review, PubMed and Czasopismo Techniczne. Architektura.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact