Social Studies of Science

1.9k papers and 69.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Social Studies of Science in the last decades have received a total of 69.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Social Studies of Science usually cover Sociology and Political Science (474 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (348 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (130 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy and History of Science (195 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (118 papers) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (114 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Studies of Science are Susan Leigh Star, James R. Griesemer, Ron Westrum, Harry Collins, Sheila Jasanoff, Trevor Pinch, Wiebe E. Bijker, María Puig de la Bellacasa, Mary Frank Fox and Annemarie Mol.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Social Studies of Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Studies of Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Studies of Science.

Countries where authors publish in Social Studies of Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Studies of Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Studies of Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Studies of Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025