Social Epistemology

1.0k papers and 8.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Social Epistemology in the last decades have received a total of 8.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Social Epistemology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (509 papers), Philosophy (314 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (168 papers) specifically the topics of Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (248 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (159 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (133 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Epistemology are Kristie Dotson, Elizabeth Anderson, José Médina, Gaile Pohlhaus, Anne Beaulieu, M R. X. Dentith, Kristen Intemann, Gloria Origgi, Myra J. Hird and Stephen John.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Social Epistemology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Epistemology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Epistemology.

Countries where authors publish in Social Epistemology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Epistemology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Epistemology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Epistemology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025