Stephen Humphry

33 papers receiving 394 citations

Peers

Stephen Humphry
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • General Psychology 18
  • Management Science and Operations Research 86
  • Education 185
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 67
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 55
Replace David Torres Irribarra with:
David Torres Irribarra Chile
Stuart Shaw United Kingdom
Andrew Kyngdon Australia
Dennison S. Bhola United States
Frank Hassebrock United States
John W. Wick United States
Gerald S. Hanna United States
Anne L. Harvey United States
Chunhua Cao United States
Yongwei Yang United States
Stephen Humphry relative to David Torres Irribarra Chile David Torres Irribarra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
David Torres Irribarra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Humphry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Humphry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Humphry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Humphry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Humphry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Humphry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Humphry. The network helps show where Stephen Humphry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Humphry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Humphry Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Humphry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201070
2 201448
3 201237
4 201331
5 201126
6 201125
7 201520
8 201516
9
Understanding the unit in the Rasch model.
200816
10 201314
11 201014
12 201312
13 201911
14 20109
15 20189
16 20178
17 20158
18 20097
19 20137
20 20176

About Stephen Humphry

Stephen Humphry is a scholar working on Education, Management Science and Operations Research, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Computer Networks and Communications and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 430 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Student Assessment and Feedback (10 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (9 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (5 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (4 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (3 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (18 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (86 citations), Education (185 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (67 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (55 citations). Stephen Humphry has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Iran. Frequent co-authors include David Andrich, Ida Marais, Joshua A. McGrane, G.R.J. Cooper, J. Bryan Carmody, Steven J. Howard, Emma Barkus, John Ehrich, Hana Burianová and Lisa Kervin. Their work appears in journals such as Theory & Psychology, Applied Measurement in Education, Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, Educational and Psychological Measurement and The Australian Educational Researcher.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact