Theory & Psychology

1.5k papers and 23.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Theory & Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 23.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Theory & Psychology usually cover Social Psychology (690 papers), General Psychology (383 papers) and Clinical Psychology (307 papers) specifically the topics of Social Representations and Identity (488 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (383 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (168 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Theory & Psychology are David L. Rennie, Joel Michell, Jaan Valsiner, Yrjö Engeström, Rom Harré, Alan Costall, Michael Bamberg, Karl Halvor Teigen, Derek Hook and Kenneth J. Gergen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Theory & Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Theory & Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Theory & Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Theory & Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Theory & Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Theory & Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theory & Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025