Emma Barkus

4.5k citations
70 papers · 3.0k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Barkus

68 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Emma Barkus
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Applied Psychology 367
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 992
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 618
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 601
  • Biological Psychiatry 71
Replace Matteo Cella with:
Matteo Cella United Kingdom
Alexandre Dumais Canada
Ulrich Reininghaus United Kingdom
Camilo J. Ruggero United States
Thomas D. Meyer United States
Dragan M. Švrakić United States
Anett Gyurak United States
Madeline H. Meier United States
Elisabeth Schramm Germany
Johanna T. W. Wigman Netherlands
Emma Barkus relative to Matteo Cella United Kingdom Matteo Cella's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Matteo Cella · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Barkus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Barkus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Barkus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Barkus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Barkus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Barkus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Barkus. The network helps show where Emma Barkus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Barkus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Barkus Line = papers co-authored together Emma Barkus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012333
2 2010221
3 2011206
4 2013161
5 2012143
6 2015136
7 2006126
8 2013126
9 2013116
10 2019113
11 2016109
12 200787
13 200683
14 201080
15 200879
16 200558
17 201055
18 201053
19 200847
20 202042

About Emma Barkus

Emma Barkus is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pharmacology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (26 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (11 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (9 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (8 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (7 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (367 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (992 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (618 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (601 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (71 citations). Emma Barkus has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Shôn Lewis, Filippo Varese, Richard P. Bentall, Johanna C. Badcock, John Stirling, Richard Hopkins, Jasper Palmier‐Claus, Graham Dunn, Shitij Kapur and Matthew Machin. Their work appears in journals such as Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, Frontiers in Psychology, Psychopathology, Schizophrenia Research and Mindfulness.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact