Scott B. Button
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Employee Performance and Motivation
Papers in
-
- Employer Branding and e-HRM 3
- Employee Performance and Motivation 1
-
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy 3
- Co-authors
- John E. Mathieu (3 shared papers)Donna Chrobot‐Mason (1 shared paper)Jeannie D. Diclementi (1 shared paper)Kathryn J. Aikin (1 shared paper)Melvin M. Mark (1 shared paper)Irwin Feller (1 shared paper)Timothy W. Elig (1 shared paper)JACK E. EDWARDS (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology (2 papers)Sex Roles (1 paper)Public Personnel Management (1 paper)Journal of Personnel Psychology (1 paper)Journal of Applied Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Scott B. Button
11 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Applied Psychology 217
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 365
- Social Psychology 528
- Gender Studies 194
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 258
Countries citing papers authored by Scott B. Button
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott B. Button's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott B. Button with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott B. Button more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott B. Button
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott B. Button. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott B. Button. The network helps show where Scott B. Button may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Scott B. Button, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 934 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 226 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 151 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 114 | |
| 5 | 1992 | 46 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 23 | |
| 7 | Armed Forces Equal Opportunity Survey | 1999 | 22 |
| 8 | 1997 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 1 |
About Scott B. Button
Scott B. Button is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 11 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (3 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (3 papers), Employer Branding and e-HRM (3 papers), Employee Performance and Motivation (1 paper), Social and Intergroup Psychology (1 paper), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (1 paper), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (1 paper) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (217 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (365 citations), Social Psychology (528 citations), Gender Studies (194 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (258 citations). Scott B. Button has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John E. Mathieu, Donna Chrobot‐Mason, Jeannie D. Diclementi, Kathryn J. Aikin, Melvin M. Mark, Irwin Feller, Timothy W. Elig, JACK E. EDWARDS and Anita R. Lancaster. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Sex Roles, Public Personnel Management, Journal of Personnel Psychology and Journal of Applied Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.