Roberta Borghi

49 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Roberta Borghi
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Physiology 2.0k
  • Biological Psychiatry 159
  • Neurology 407
  • Pharmacology 606
  • Neurology 426
Replace Weihui Zhou with:
Weihui Zhou China
Elena Tamagno Italy
Elizabeth A. Eckman United States
Michela Guglielmotto Italy
Robert J. Mark United States
Catherine A. Rottkamp United States
Troy T. Rohn United States
Valérie Vingtdeux United States
Wenzhang Wang China
Roberta Borghi relative to Weihui Zhou China Weihui Zhou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Weihui Zhou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roberta Borghi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roberta Borghi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberta Borghi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberta Borghi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roberta Borghi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberta Borghi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberta Borghi. The network helps show where Roberta Borghi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roberta Borghi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roberta Borghi Line = papers co-authored together Roberta Borghi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002322
2 2000300
3 2005286
4 2007285
5 2010195
6 2017183
7 2005168
8 2019142
9 2000135
10 2000127
11 200483
12 200574
13 200873
14 200671
15 201256
16 201150
17 200944
18 200739
19 201132
20 201030

About Roberta Borghi

Roberta Borghi is a scholar working on Physiology, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 49 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (33 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (10 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (9 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (6 papers), Advanced Glycation End Products research (6 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (2.0k citations), Biological Psychiatry (159 citations), Neurology (407 citations), Pharmacology (606 citations) and Neurology (426 citations). Roberta Borghi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Massimo Tabaton, D Zaccheo, Patrizio Odetti, Alessandra Piccini, Fiammetta Monacelli, George Perry, Oliviero Danni, Mark A. Smith, Antonella Vitali and Elena Tamagno. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Neurobiology of Aging, Journal of Neurochemistry, Neurobiology of Disease and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact