Journal of Alzheimer s Disease

10.4k papers and 308.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 10.4k papers published in Journal of Alzheimer s Disease in the last decades have received a total of 308.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Alzheimer s Disease usually cover Physiology (5.3k papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (3.9k papers) and Molecular Biology (2.1k papers) specifically the topics of Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4.7k papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3.6k papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (786 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Alzheimer s Disease are P. Hemachandra Reddy, Suzanne M. de la Monte, Russell H. Swerdlow, Ashley I. Bush, Jack R. Wands, Michael P. Murphy, Harry LeVine, George Perry, Eugenia Trushina and Kaj Blennow.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Alzheimer s Disease

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Alzheimer s Disease.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Alzheimer s Disease

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Alzheimer s Disease with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Alzheimer s Disease more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025