Robert Cantwell

39 papers receiving 553 citations

Peers

Robert Cantwell
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Music 68
  • Family Practice 31
  • Education 333
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 122
  • General Health Professions 136
Replace Clinton Golding with:
Clinton Golding New Zealand
Karel M. Stokking Netherlands
Steven A. Melnick United States
Kit Sinclair Hong Kong
Gerald Grow United States
Stewart Ehly United States
Harrison Tse Hong Kong
César Orsini Chile
Kevin Gosselin United States
Tony Ghaye United Kingdom
Robert Cantwell relative to Clinton Golding New Zealand Clinton Golding's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Clinton Golding · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Cantwell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Cantwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Cantwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Cantwell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Cantwell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Cantwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Cantwell. The network helps show where Robert Cantwell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Robert Cantwell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Cantwell Line = papers co-authored together Robert Cantwell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200180
2 200263
3 201459
4 199656
5 200953
6 199948
7 200436
8 201128
9 199426
10 201522
11
Relationships among Control Beliefs, Approaches to Learning, and the Academic Performance of Final-Year Nurses.
199821
12 201120
13 200719
14 200214
15 201214
16 199913
17 201313
18 199712
19 201210
20 19989

About Robert Cantwell

Robert Cantwell is a scholar working on Education, Music, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 676 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (9 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (9 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers), Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions (5 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (4 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (4 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (3 papers) and Higher Education and Employability (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (68 citations), Family Practice (31 citations), Education (333 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (122 citations) and General Health Professions (136 citations). Robert Cantwell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Sid Bourke, Jill Scevak, Jennifer Archer, Phillip J. Moore, Allyson Holbrook, Margaret Kiley, David Boud, Catherine Manathunga, Kylie Shaw and Bruce R. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Higher Education Research & Development, Journal of American Folklore, Educational Psychology, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and British Journal of Educational Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact