Educational Psychology

1.9k papers and 52.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Educational Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 52.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Educational Psychology usually cover Education (954 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (806 papers) and Social Psychology (631 papers) specifically the topics of Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (365 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (274 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (250 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Educational Psychology are Mark Carter, Keith J. Topping, Richard Riding, Stephanie A. Atkinson, Huy P. Phan, Simon Cassidy, Mark J. Clayton, Fernando Doménech Betoret, Li‐fang Zhang and David W. Chan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Educational Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Educational Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Educational Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Educational Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Educational Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Educational Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Educational Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025