Music
Impact in
-
- Theatre and Performance Studies
-
- Neuroscience and Music Perception
Also classified as
-
- Theatre and Performance Studies 10.1k
Music
11.1k papers receiving 36.1k citations
Countries where authors publish papers about Music
This map shows the geographic impact of research in Music. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Music with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Music more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers about Music
This network shows the impact of papers covering Music. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Music.
About Music
197k papers covering Music have received a total of 937.5k indexed citations since 1951 . Papers on Music are most often about the specific topic of Musicology and Musical Analysis, Music History and Culture, Diverse Music Education Insights, Theater, Performance, and Music History, Diverse Musicological Studies, Theatre and Performance Studies, Music Technology and Sound Studies and Music Education and Analysis and also cover the fields of Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies, General Arts and Humanities and History. Papers citing work on Music are usually about Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cultural Studies and Literature and Literary Theory. Some of the most active scholars covering Music are Tia DeNora, Leonard B. Meyer, Dick Hebdige, Simon Frith, David J. Hargreaves, Susan Hallam, Andy Bennett, E. Glenn Schellenberg, Gary Edward McPherson and Jane W. Davidson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.