Richard Booth

95 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Richard Booth's Hit Papers

Predicted Influences of Artificial Intelligence on Nursing Education: Scoping Review 2021 · 179 citations
1790+1+3Years since publication50100150

Peers

Richard Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Health Informatics 228
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 53
  • Health Information Management 140
  • Health 221
  • Research and Theory 17
Replace Anne Moen with:
Anne Moen Norway
Jennie C. De Gagné United States
Charlene H. Chu Canada
Gillian Strudwick Canada
Ming Tai-Seale United States
Tom Delbanco United States
Laurie L. Novak United States
Irena Papadopoulos United Kingdom
Michelle Honey New Zealand
Amr Jamal Saudi Arabia
Richard Booth relative to Anne Moen Norway Anne Moen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
Anne Moen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Booth. The network helps show where Richard Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Booth Line = papers co-authored together Richard Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 109 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021185
2
Predicted Influences of Artificial Intelligence on Nursing Education: Scoping Review
Hit paper breakdown →
2021179
3 2020138
4 202178
5 201858
6
Social media use in nursing education.
201258
7 201254
8 201252
9 202047
10 201944
11 201842
12 200636
13 201435
14 202034
15 201734
16 201931
17 202030
18 201529
19 202229
20 201728

About Richard Booth

Richard Booth is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health, Health Information Management, Sociology and Political Science and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 109 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (15 papers), Social Media in Health Education (13 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (13 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (8 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (6 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (5 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (228 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (53 citations), Health Information Management (140 citations), Health (221 citations) and Research and Theory (17 citations). Richard Booth has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gillian Strudwick, Siobhán O’Connor, Megan Bamford, Rita Wilson, Tracie Risling, M Lyndsay Howitt, Christine Buchanan, Susan McBride, Ana Laura Solano López and Lorie Donelle. Their work appears in journals such as CIN Computers Informatics Nursing, BMJ Open, Nurse Education Today, Nurse Education in Practice and Journal of Medical Internet Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact