Nurse Education Today

6.3k papers and 157.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.3k papers published in Nurse Education Today in the last decades have received a total of 157.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Nurse Education Today usually cover General Health Professions (2.3k papers), Education (1.7k papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.5k papers) specifically the topics of Nursing education and management (1.4k papers), Innovations in Medical Education (1.1k papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (921 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nurse Education Today are Berit Lundman, Ulla Hällgren Graneheim, Philip Burnard, Tracy Levett‐Jones, Britt‐Marie Lindgren, Cynthia Y Akinsanya, John Fowler, Philip Darbyshire, Sally Redfern and Peter Jarvis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nurse Education Today

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nurse Education Today. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nurse Education Today.

Countries where authors publish in Nurse Education Today

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nurse Education Today. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nurse Education Today with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nurse Education Today more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025