Cheryl Forchuk

4.1k citations
212 papers · 2.8k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Cheryl Forchuk

193 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Cheryl Forchuk
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • General Health Professions 1.3k
  • Research and Theory 44
  • Clinical Psychology 795
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 29
  • Applied Psychology 116
Replace Kim Lützén with:
Kim Lützén Sweden
Geraldine Macdonald United Kingdom
Sue Davies United Kingdom
Angela L. Rollins United States
Kevin Gournay United Kingdom
Dianne Wynaden Australia
Ben Hannigan United Kingdom
Jan Horsfall Australia
Catherine Ward‐Griffin Canada
Gordon Grant United Kingdom
Cheryl Forchuk relative to Kim Lützén Sweden Kim Lützén's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Kim Lützén · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl Forchuk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Forchuk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Forchuk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Forchuk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl Forchuk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Forchuk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Forchuk. The network helps show where Cheryl Forchuk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cheryl Forchuk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheryl Forchuk Line = papers co-authored together Cheryl Forchuk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 212 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200599
2 201588
3 202178
4 200675
5 201572
6 200169
7 200163
8 200656
9 201954
10 200654
11 200953
12 199450
13 199849
14 201944
15 198944
16 200341
17 200941
18 200739
19 200838
20
How to critique qualitative research articles.
199338

About Cheryl Forchuk

Cheryl Forchuk is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Finance and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 212 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homelessness and Social Issues (69 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (29 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (21 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (19 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (19 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (15 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (14 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (1.3k citations), Research and Theory (44 citations), Clinical Psychology (795 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (29 citations) and Applied Psychology (116 citations). Cheryl Forchuk has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mary‐Lou Martin, Elsabeth Jensen, Catherine Ward‐Griffin, Hélène Berman, Phyllis Montgomery, Carroll Iwasiw, Mary‐Anne Andrusyszyn, W. Reynolds, Andrew Thomas Reyes and Richard Booth. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, Nursing Science Quarterly, Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Mental Health Nursing and Psychiatric Services.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact