Anne Moen

2.1k citations
117 papers · 1.3k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Anne Moen

104 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Anne Moen
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Health Informatics 63
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 46
  • Health Information Management 133
  • Research and Theory 14
  • General Health Professions 234
Replace Karen L. Courtney with:
Karen L. Courtney United States
B.-T. Karsh United States
Gillian Strudwick Canada
Marc M. Triola United States
Lacey Colligan United States
Richard J. Holden United States
Florin Oprescu Australia
Dari Alhuwail Kuwait
Richard Booth Canada
Irena Papadopoulos United Kingdom
Anne Moen relative to Karen L. Courtney United States Karen L. Courtney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Karen L. Courtney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Moen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Moen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Moen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Moen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Moen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Moen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Moen. The network helps show where Anne Moen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne Moen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Moen Line = papers co-authored together Anne Moen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 117 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005136
2 202194
3 202287
4 201974
5 202257
6 201841
7 201937
8 200829
9 201326
10 202126
11 200325
12 200022
13 201722
14 201922
15 201022
16 201618
17 202118
18 202217
19 202317
20 201217

About Anne Moen

Anne Moen is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health Information Management, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Sociology and Political Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 117 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (11 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (9 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (8 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (7 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (5 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (5 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (5 papers) and Nutrition and Health in Aging (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (63 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (46 citations), Health Information Management (133 citations), Research and Theory (14 citations) and General Health Professions (234 citations). Anne Moen has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Patrícia Flatley Brennan, Per Hjortdahl, Catherine Chronaki, Oscar Tamburis, Arriel Benis, Hilde Eide, Reidar Pedersen, Ida Torunn Bjørk, Kristin Skeide Fuglerud and Espen Andreas Brembo. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Yearbook of Medical Informatics, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Journal of Workplace Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact