Gillian Strudwick

124 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Gillian Strudwick
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 87
  • Health Information Management 287
  • Health Informatics 71
  • Applied Psychology 131
  • General Health Professions 318
Replace Richard Booth with:
Richard Booth Canada
Anne Moen Norway
Ming Tai-Seale United States
Michelle Honey New Zealand
Laurie L. Novak United States
Leila Ahmadian Iran
Karen A. Monsen United States
Nicholas R. Hardiker United Kingdom
Julie Payne-Gagnon Canada
Joshua E. Richardson United States
Gillian Strudwick relative to Richard Booth Canada Richard Booth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Richard Booth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gillian Strudwick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gillian Strudwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gillian Strudwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gillian Strudwick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gillian Strudwick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gillian Strudwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gillian Strudwick. The network helps show where Gillian Strudwick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gillian Strudwick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gillian Strudwick Line = papers co-authored together Gillian Strudwick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 140 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021185
2 2020143
3 201568
4 202167
5 202250
6 201947
7 201940
8 201837
9 202034
10 201734
11 201933
12 202331
13 201931
14 201630
15 201728
16 201928
17 202224
18 202022
19 202119
20 202318

About Gillian Strudwick

Gillian Strudwick is a scholar working on Health Information Management, General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 140 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (42 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (24 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (16 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (14 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (10 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (10 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (9 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (87 citations), Health Information Management (287 citations), Health Informatics (71 citations), Applied Psychology (131 citations) and General Health Professions (318 citations). Gillian Strudwick has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Richard Booth, Lydia Sequeira, Susan McBride, Ana Laura Solano López, Siobhán O’Connor, Damian Jankowicz, Lynn Nagle, Timothy Zhang, Tania Tajirian and Jessica Kemp. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Digital Health, International Journal of Medical Informatics and BMC Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact